Can LLM’s Benefit From “Proprietary” Training
When composing a prompt for an LLM, it is possible to specify, “in the style of,” both for images and for prose. When training an Ai/LLM can we develop a proprietary quality improvement, by specifying a particular Dictionary (some specific printing of Webster’s or the OED) to include the carefulness of defining language and the creativity and variety [aka “diversity”] of the example usage sentences ? For another application of the same idea, what is the result of including Cicero, Caesar, Montesquieu, Machiavelli and Tocqueville in specific translations and printings? Expanding on this concept, Jonathan Swift, Daniel Defoe, R. L. Stevenson, Earnest Hemingway and Mark Twain would each offer a unique characteristic. Do we improve or adulterate, when we “build on that success,” by including more gross content, or cross sections for variety?